The Success Rates of Addiction Interventions are higher with Professional Interventionists

How Well do Interventions Work?

Interventions, whether conducted by friends, family, coworkers or a mixture of all three, are one of the leading ways to get an individual into an addiction rehabilitation program. An intervention by definition must be considered at least minimally coercive, because the individual necessitating the intervention would’ve been unlikely to voluntarily enter treatment, or else the intervention would’ve been unnecessary. While it may not be quite as coercive as a court mandate, the consequences and pressures that an addict faces during an intervention would not likely lead one to believe that the substance disorder abuser voluntarily chose to enter rehab.

In this article, we will examine research and studies conducted on the efficacy of interventions with and without the use of a professional interventionist. We will also examine the impact of forced or coercive treatment on a recovering addict versus the efficacy of treatment on an individual who voluntarily chose to seek addiction recovery services.

A Review of Intervention Definitions and Techniques

It is commonly stated that the last person to notice that he or she is struggling with drug or alcohol addiction is the addict. Long before the addict becomes aware of the existence of a substance abuse problem, friends and family members have often already detected it.

According to an article published on, 95 percent of substance abusers do not realize they have a problem.1 The purpose of an intervention is to make the addict realize that he or she has a problem and then make the decision to seek treatment.

If a person waits to long to get help an intervention can come in the form of a legal mandate from a drug court as an alternative to prison.

An addiction intervention can range from making a simple suggestion or having an honest conversation to a formal intervention gathering where all participants detail how they’ve noticed substance abuse impact the addict.

If a person waits to long to get help an intervention can come in the form of a legal mandate from a drug court as an alternative to prison. Unfortunaely, the criminal justice system contiues to be the largest referrer of patients to substance abuse treatment in the nation.2 In this case, the motivation to intervene is mostly about the public good, which will always be improved when an individual’s wellbeing has improved.

Direct, Indirect and Forcible Interventions

In general, all types of addiction interventions will fall under one of three categories: direct, indirect and forcible.

A direct intervention is the most popular type and involves family members, friends and other loved ones confronting the addict and laying out a plan of treatment. In this style of intervention, the addict has little say about anything other than whether he or she will agree to treatment, as the location and course of treatment are already predetermined by the intervention participants, as are the consequences should the addict not agree to receive help. This style is especially helpful for addicts who appear unlikely to take the first step in seeking substance abuse treatment.

An indirect intervention focuses on the addict’s family and environment. In some unfortunate cases, the family and friends of the addict realize there is a problem, but the addict refuses to accept treatment. An indirect intervention provides guidance for those closest to the addict, to make his or her environment more conducive to healing.

Forcible interventions occur as a result of an addict’s civil liberties being suspended. This normally comes in the form of a court or doctor ordered mandate. This is usually the last resort, because it is preferred that a person give consent prior to any sort of medical treatment or procedure. Only in cases where the addict appears to be a danger to himself or those around him, or when substance abuse is exacerbating a preexisting serious psychological condition, is forcible intervention used.

Some Specific Types of Addiction Interventions

  • Johnson Institute Model: This type of intervention evolved from the confrontational, blame-associated strategies primarily utilized until the late 1990s. Instead of focusing on vilifying the addict, the Johnson model focuses on educating the addict’s caretakers on how to confront the addict and convince him or her to seek help.3
  • ARISE Intervention: This involves a combination of both direct and indirect intervening and focuses on the entire family, since addiction is a disease that impacts the whole family unit. In ARISE, both the addict and his family members are encouraged to seek addiction treatment and education. One study found that the ARISE strategy led to 83 percent of addicts agreeing to receive treatment.4
  • Crisis Intervention: While this may begin as a direct intervention, it can quickly become a forcible one. Crisis interventions are held to prevent some life crisis from occurring as a result of substance abuse. This may be required if an individual is neglecting parental duties or putting him/herself in danger as a result of constant abuse.
  • Tough Love: This strategy should be viewed as a last resort, because it not only involves making threats to the addict if he does not receive treatment, but it also involves following through.5 This includes parents cutting off financial support to children, spouses threatening divorce, employers threatening termination and a host of other potential consequences.

Do Addiction Interventions Work?

This very simple question does not have many simple answers. This is because defining success is difficult and often subjective. Is the goal for the individual to agree to seek treatment? Is the objective for him or her to complete treatment? Is sustained sobriety the primary aim; and if so, what quantity of time qualifies as “sustained?” The very arbitrary nature by which one family or addict defines success versus another makes answering the question of whether addiction interventions work very inexact.

On one hand, there is strong evidence that correlates familial involvement in addiction treatment to successful outcomes.6 But an intervention without the guidance of a licensed professional interventionist can potentially strain the relationship between an addict and his or her family. He or she may feel betrayed, hurt, ambushed and/or angry – likely derailing the intervention effort and potentially alienating the addict from the family.

While an addiction intervention conducted by friends and family can be helpful in getting an addict to receive treatment, the intervention itself is not a factor in the eventual outcome of the rehabilitation.7

What Research Says About Interventions

It is widely believed by much of the medical community and the addiction recovery industry that interventions make an addict more likely to seek help, and chances of success improve when working with a professional interventionist.

The National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD), reports a higher than 90 percent success rate of interventions involving a trained professional result in the addict agreeing to seek treatment.8

It is important to remember that no two addicts are alike, no two groups of interveners are alike, and each addiction comes with differing levels of severity, depending on the type of substance(s) being abused and the length of time addiction has had to set in. These factors and others make it virtually impossible to isolate all potential variables to achieve a true qualitative result. These numbers will also vary depending on the source.

The television show “Intervention” embraced the direct intervention approach and boasted a very impressive 71 percent success rate (meaning percentage of clients who remained sober following treatment) as of 2010. It’s worth noting that the success rates have declined as more time has passed, because patients began relapsing. In 2013, the success rate fell to 64.2 percent; in 2015, it dropped to 55 percent.9 However, this success rate is still highly impressive when compared against the rest of the industry.

The Impact of Voluntary Addiction Treatment vs. Involuntary

One of the most commonly perpetuated falsities in the addiction rehabilitation industry is the notion that an addict who is involuntarily admitted into rehab cannot and will not benefit from the ensuing addiction treatment. While the statement seems intuitively correct, research and real-life application have debunked this claim.

In general, coerced addiction treatment is the result of one of the following:

  • Child Custody Conditions
  • Criminal Justice
  • Child Protective Services
  • Civil Commitment Programs
  • Drug Court Supervision
  • Parole
  • Probation

A 2005 study published in the American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse compared the treatment outcomes of methamphetamine addicts who were forced into rehabilitation against those who voluntarily sought treatment. The research determined that there was no statistical difference in the results.10

One study in particular, “The Effectiveness of Coerced Treatment for Drug-Abusing Offenders” contends that “legally referred clients do as well or better than voluntary clients in and out of treatment.”11 The researchers for this article found several examples of addicts actually doing better in treatment following an involuntary admission. This is largely due to the threat of legal consequences for a failure to submit to treatment, which does not apply in all interventions.

Drug courts are diversionary addiction treatment programs used in place of incarceration for eligible individuals. They have been proven to decrease crime, save money and reduce drug abuse among the people in their programs.12

Based on these findings and many others, one can conclude that the way in which a person enters addiction treatment bears little impact on the final result. The most important thing for individuals with substance abuse problems is to get the help they need. Once an individual is in rehab, his or her level of success will ultimately depend on several different factors, the least of which will be whether the treatment was voluntary or involuntary.

Discussion and Recommendations

An addict’s friends or family members can often find themselves feeling as powerless as bystanders watching an impending car wreck.

Professional intervention is a highly recommended and successful way of getting someone you care for to recognize his or her addiction, the damage it is causing and then make the decision to get help.

There are no guarantees of success when it comes to drug addiction and alcoholism rehab, but there are several steps you can take to help improve your loved one’s chances:

  • Don’t Wait for Rock Bottom: Too often, those closest to the addict wait too long before stepping in and saying something. Interventions like these are often the result of some catastrophic event and thus become reactive instead of proactive. The earlier you can identify the problem and take action, the better the chances for a successful recovery.13
  • Focus on Solutions, Not Problems: As we’ve observed on television, interventions can often take on combative tones. This is the opposite of what you want. You don’t want to put the addict on the defensive. Instead, you want to show that your concern is based in love and care for their wellbeing. You do this by remaining positive and politely refuting any excuses the addict makes for not wanting treatment.
  • Realize Your Role: Few addictions are allowed to go on without the help of some enabling factors. Whether it is providing funds or transportation, freely abusing substances around the addict, allowing a mental disorder to go untreated, creating an atmosphere which may trigger the addict to abuse or anything else, each family member or friend can likely identify ways in which they have contributed to or enabled addiction.
  • Be Prepared to Stick to Consequences: One of the more difficult things for family members and friends involved in an intervention is to consistently enforce laid out consequences for the addict refusing treatment. Failing to stick to consequences only serves to enable the addict to keep abusing drugs or alcohol. The consequences are put in place to make addiction treatment seem like the best option.
  • Get a Professional: As stated earlier, interventions are highly effective at getting an addict to accept addiction treatment when a trained professional is involved. If you’re like most people, your only experience with an addiction intervention came from watching a movie or television show. An interventionist will guide you and your family through every step of the process, instruct you on what to say and how to say it and will maintain order as the one impartial voice in the intervention.



This article was written by addiction care experts at Behavioral Health of the Palm Beaches. We are committed to offering the most comprehensive addiction treatment services in the nation and being thought leaders in the addiction recovery community.